IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MPx 220 Pix
sclui56
post Oct 9 2004, 11:23 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 22-September 04
Member No.: 5,021



While this is not an issue for me as I simply don't care much about the cameras in a phone, but lots of people asked about the pix quality and here are a few I snapped:

http://www.fototime.com/inv/E06C026BC16C254
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t3m17
post Oct 9 2004, 12:21 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 29-March 04
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 2,463
Phone: HTC Hurricane
Carrier: Alltel



That looks improved from the last ones I've seen. I dont know if they are up to par with other 1.3 megapixel cameras though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sclui56
post Oct 9 2004, 01:28 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 22-September 04
Member No.: 5,021



QUOTE
That looks improved from the last ones I've seen.


OMG!!! If what you said is true (have no reason to doubt otherwise), than the product manager should be stoned to death with discontinued 200's wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
t3m17
post Oct 9 2004, 01:32 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 29-March 04
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 2,463
Phone: HTC Hurricane
Carrier: Alltel



QUOTE
QUOTE
That looks improved from the last ones I've seen.


OMG!!! If what you said is true (have no reason to doubt otherwise), than the product manager should be stoned to death with discontinued 200's wink.gif


why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sclui56
post Oct 9 2004, 02:16 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 22-September 04
Member No.: 5,021



Why?

Simple, I figured that I cannot be objective because I shoot with EOS digital but still I thought what I saw was pretty crappy regardless. Then my 16 year-old saw the pix while I was uploading to the web, and she asked me what they were - that's when she grabbed me and showed me some of the pix she captured from her lowly el-cheapo web cam, and they were a lot better than the 220's.

If I were part of the team, I would have really source a different supplier for the sensor, but then again, I don't know of all the specifics surrounding the decision.

So when you said improved, I was merely surprised because the engineering samples must have been horrible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
project110
post Oct 11 2004, 02:42 PM
Post #6


Junior Member


Group: Members
Posts: 11
Joined: 30-July 04
Member No.: 4,279



hey thanks for posting those pix! I have been looking at all of the reviews trying to find samples. HA!! you are right someone needs to be stoned for releasing that as a 1.3 camera. The pix are just about as crappy as a VGA cam - these are just bigger!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 04:37 PM